Skip to content
Yardstick
  1. Models
  2. Anthropic
  3. Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic · Flagship · Sep 1, 2026New

Anthropic's most capable generally available model, built for the hardest reasoning and long-running agent work. Thinking is always on.

Announcement (opens in a new tab)
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
53.4#3 of 29 · max effort
API price per 1M tokens
$10 / $50input / output · $20 blended
Context window
1Mup to 128K output tokens
Output speed
66 t/s4m 54s to first answer at max effort

Benchmark results

Each row shows this model (blue) against every other model in the catalogue (grey), worst on the left, best on the right.

Overall capability

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index53.4#3 of 29

    Max effort, default refusal fallback enabled

    11.357.6
  • Epoch Capabilities Index164.7#5 of 16
    146.9167.3
  • LiveBench83.4%#1 of 23

    Max effort

    63.9%83.4%

Coding

  • Terminal-Bench 4.057.9%#5 of 13

    Claude Code harness, max effort

    14.6%64.8%
  • SWE-Bench Pro (V2 Hard)92.2%#1 of 5

    Claude Code harness, high effort

    58.8%92.2%
  • Arena WebDev1,745#5 of 27

    Max effort

    1,2631,814

Agents & professional work

  • GDPval-AA1,756#3 of 18
    1,2421,866
  • Vending-Bench 2$5,422#6 of 9
    $2,158$15,515

Reasoning

  • ARC-AGI-290%#4 of 11

    Max effort

    42.4%95%
  • FrontierMath (Tiers 1–3)90.2%#4 of 14

    Max effort

    53%93.7%
  • MathArena82.6%#4 of 10

    Max effort

    35.3%90.1%
  • SimpleBench86.6%#2 of 12
    45.8%88.4%

Knowledge & science

  • Humanity's Last Exam (Diamond)51.3%#3 of 9
    13.4%60.6%

Multimodal

  • Arena Vision1,288#5 of 15

    Max effort

    1,1991,301

Human preference

  • Arena Text1,501#3 of 24

    Max effort

    1,4251,525

Reasoning effort trade-offs

The same model at different thinking budgets. More effort buys a higher intelligence score at a higher cost per task and a longer wait. Measured by Artificial Analysis.

EffortScoreCost / taskFirst answerSpeed
Low
46.8
$2.373.9s54 t/s
Medium
48.9
$2.987.6s54 t/s
High
51.1
$3.9123s58 t/s
Xhigh
53.2
$5.9881s58 t/s
Max (headline score)
53.4
$7.634m 54s66 t/s

Specs & pricing

Developer
Anthropic
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Availability
Generally available
API model ID
claude-fable-5-1
Weights
Proprietary (API only)
Reasoning
Always on
Knowledge cutoff
Jun 2026
Accepts
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Context window
1,000,000 tokens
Max output
128,000 tokens
Input price
$10 / 1M tokens
Output price
$50 / 1M tokens
Cached input
$0.25 / 1M tokens

Closest alternatives

Models from other labs nearest to Claude Fable 5.1 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

  • GPT-6 Astra

    OpenAI

    Intelligence 52.7 · $10 / $50

    Compare side by side
  • Gemini 4 Argon

    Google

    Intelligence 52.6 · $2 / $10

    Compare side by side
  • GPT-6.1 Sol

    OpenAI

    Intelligence 51.8 · $2 / $10

    Compare side by side

Sources

  • Announcement (opens in a new tab)
  • Model documentation (opens in a new tab)
  • System card (opens in a new tab)
  • Pricing (opens in a new tab)
Yardstick

A plain reading of how today’s SI models compare. Scores are taken from each benchmark’s own leaderboard wherever one exists; anything a lab reported about its own model is marked.

Data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Explore

  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Value
  • Labs
  • Methodology & sources

Sources

  • Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)
  • Arena (opens in a new tab)
  • Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (opens in a new tab)
  • ARC Prize (opens in a new tab)
  • Terminal-Bench (opens in a new tab)
  • Scale AI Labs (opens in a new tab)

Yardstick is an independent reference and is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any lab listed. Product names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to identify them. Benchmarks are imperfect proxies: check a model on your own task before you commit to it.

  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Value
  • Labs
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Value
  • Labs
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Value
  • Labs