Skip to catalog
FbFable
CatalogLabsScoresCompare
Catalog
A

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

claude-fable-5

62Index
ClosedGenerally available1M contextTextImage

Pick this when

The last few points of capability when you have already measured an edge over Opus.

Skip when

You need zero data retention, or you picked it only because the catalog lists it above Opus.

Nominal flagship. Independent scores sit one point behind Opus 5 at twice the price. Treat the name as marketing until your own eval says otherwise.

Price

Input / 1M
$10
Output / 1M
$50
Measured task
$3.14

Covered Model: 30-day retention, no zero-data-retention. Safety routing can fall back to Opus 4.8.

Shape

Context
1M
Max output
128K
Released
2026-07
Tools
Yes
Reasoning
Yes

Scores

Intelligence index62
GPQA Diamond92
Terminal-Bench 2.185
Agentic index57
Arena
2003
Speed
106/s
GPQA
91.8%
Term.
84.6%
  • AA Index. The single number most people mean by “how smart.” It is a blend, so a specialist can lose here and still win the job you care about.
  • GPQA. A clean test of hard reasoning. PhD experts sit around 65%. It says little about writing, tools, or taste.
  • Term.. Closest public proxy for coding agents that live in a terminal. A high index score with a weak terminal score is a warning.
  • Arena. Captures taste and usefulness that unit tests miss. Sample size varies by model, so treat gaps under ~100 Elo as noise.

Anthropic · San Francisco. Claude. Opus 5 leads public intelligence rankings. Fable 5 is the named flagship and the expensive one. Sonnet 5 is the daily driver.

Compiled 2026-08-28 from public Artificial Analysis, LMSYS-style arena, and first-party price sheets. Scores move. Recheck before you spend.

A two-point gap on the intelligence index is noise for most work. Cost per finished task is the number that shows up on the invoice.