Skip to content
Model Index
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
LabsMethodology
  1. Benchmarks
  2. Coding

Vibe Code Bench

Independent testVals AI · updated Oct 7, 2026

What it measures

Building a complete, working application end to end from a product specification.

How to read it

Tests whether a model can carry a whole build rather than fix one bug. The top of the field is beginning to bunch together.

Open at Vals AI
Best
92.4%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Median
81.7%
GPT-6 Luna

Results

26 of 41 tracked models have a result.

Filter in explorer
  1. 1
    Claude Sonnet 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    92.4%
  2. 2
    Gemini 4 ArgonLimited

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    91.9%
  3. 3
    Claude Haiku 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    90.4%
  4. 4
    Claude Opus 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    90.3%
  5. 5
    Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic · Max effort

    90.3%
  6. 6
    GPT-6 Astra

    OpenAI · Max effort

    89.6%
  7. 7
    GPT-6.1 Sol

    OpenAI · Max effort

    88.9%
  8. 8
    Grok 4.7

    SpaceXAI · xHigh effort

    86.2%
  9. 9
    Muse Spark 1.3

    Meta · Max effort

    85.9%
  10. 10
    MiMo-V2.6-ProOpen

    Xiaomi

    85.2%
  11. 11
    Kimi K3Open

    Moonshot AI · Max effort

    85.0%
  12. 12
    DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpen

    DeepSeek · High effort

    84.7%
  13. 13
    DeepSeek V4 ProOpen

    DeepSeek · Max effort

    82.3%
  14. 14
    GPT-6 Luna

    OpenAI · Max effort

    81.7%
  15. 15
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashOpen

    Xiaomi

    79.0%
  16. 16
    Gemini 3.8 Flash

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    78.7%
  17. 17
    Mistral Large 4

    Mistral AI · High effort

    78.4%
  18. 18
    GLM-5.3Open

    Z.ai · Max effort

    78.1%
  19. 19
    Hy4 previewOpen

    Tencent

    77.5%
  20. 20
    GPT-5.6 Terra

    OpenAI · Max effort

    74.6%
  21. 21
    Step 5 Preview

    StepFun

    70.4%
  22. 22
    Qwen3.8-Max

    Alibaba

    64.7%
  23. 23
    MiniMax-M3Open

    MiniMax

    47.6%
  24. 24
    Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    32.0%
  25. 25
    TM
    InklingOpen

    Thinking Machines Lab

    19.2%
  26. 26
    TM
    Inkling-SmallOpen

    Thinking Machines Lab

    19.1%
15 tracked models without a result

Command A+, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Gemma 4 31B, GLM-5.3-Flash, gpt-oss-120b, Hy3, Kimi K2.7 Code, MAI-Thinking-1, Mistral Medium 3.5, Mistral Small 4, Muse Glimmer 30B, Nemotron 3 Ultra, Nova 2 Lite, Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen3.8-Flash.

Missing means the evaluator has not published a run, not that the model would score poorly.

Model Index

An independent snapshot of frontier SI models and how they perform on third-party benchmarks.

Data as of Oct 8, 2026

Explore

  • All models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Model finder
  • Labs
  • Methodology & sources

Sources

Benchmark results come from Artificial Analysis, Arena, Vals AI and ARC Prize. Specifications and prices come from each lab's own documentation.

Not affiliated with any lab or evaluator. Names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to identify them. Scores change often — check the linked source before making a decision that depends on one.

  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder