Terminal-Bench 4.0
Results
38 of 41 tracked models have a result.
- 1
Anthropic · Max effort
63.6% - 2
Anthropic · Max effort
59.6% - 3
OpenAI · Max effort
59.1% - 4Gemini 4 ArgonLimited
Google DeepMind · High effort
57.1% - 5
OpenAI · Max effort
56.1% - 6
Anthropic · Max effort
52.0% - 7GLM-5.3Open
Z.ai · Max effort
41.9% - 8
Alibaba
38.9% - 9
OpenAI · Max effort
35.4% - 10MiMo-V2.6-ProOpen
Xiaomi
34.8% - 11
Meta · Max effort
33.3% - 11
StepFun
33.3% - 13
Anthropic · Max effort
32.8% - 13GLM-5.3-FlashOpen
Z.ai
32.8% - 15
DeepSeek · Max effort
26.8% - 15
Mistral AI
26.8% - 17
SpaceXAI · xHigh effort
25.8% - 18Qwen3.8-FlashOpen
Alibaba
25.3% - 19MiMo-V2.6-FlashOpen
Xiaomi
22.7% - 20
Google DeepMind · High effort
19.7% - 21DeepSeek V4 ProOpen
DeepSeek · Max effort
14.1% - 22
OpenAI · Max effort
12.6% - 22Kimi K3Open
Moonshot AI · Max effort
12.6% - 24Qwen3.8-27BOpen
Alibaba · xHigh effort
5.6% - 25
Google DeepMind
4.0% - 26MiniMax-M3Open
MiniMax
2.0% - 27
Google DeepMind
1.0% - 27InklingOpen
Thinking Machines Lab · xHigh effort
1.0% - 27Inkling-SmallOpen
Thinking Machines Lab
1.0% - 27Kimi K2.7 CodeOpen
Moonshot AI
1.0% - 31Command A+Open
Cohere
0.5% - 31Hy3Open
Tencent
0.5% - 31Muse Glimmer 30BOpen
Meta · High effort
0.5% - 31Nemotron 3 UltraOpen
NVIDIA · Reasoning effort
0.5% - 35Gemma 4 31BOpen
Google DeepMind · Reasoning effort
0.0% - 35gpt-oss-120bOpen
OpenAI · High effort
0.0% - 35
Mistral AI
0.0% - 35Mistral Small 4Open
Mistral AI · Reasoning effort
0.0%
3 tracked models without a result
Hy4 preview, MAI-Thinking-1, Nova 2 Lite.
Missing means the evaluator has not published a run, not that the model would score poorly.