Skip to content
Model Index
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
LabsMethodology
  1. Benchmarks
  2. Agents & knowledge work

Finance Agent v2

Independent testVals AI · updated Oct 7, 2026

What it measures

Multi-step financial analyst tasks that require research, calculation and judgement.

How to read it

Even the best model completes about two thirds of tasks — treat output as a draft for review, not a finished analysis.

Open at Vals AI
Best
65.4%
Gemini 4 Argon
Median
53.5%
GPT-6 Astra

Results

26 of 41 tracked models have a result.

Filter in explorer
  1. 1
    Gemini 4 ArgonLimited

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    65.4%
  2. 2
    Gemini 3.8 Flash

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    61.4%
  3. 3
    Muse Spark 1.3

    Meta · Max effort

    60.0%
  4. 4
    Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic · Max effort

    58.9%
  5. 5
    Claude Opus 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    58.6%
  6. 6
    Claude Sonnet 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    58.1%
  7. 7
    MiMo-V2.6-ProOpen

    Xiaomi

    57.3%
  8. 8
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashOpen

    Xiaomi

    56.3%
  9. 9
    GLM-5.3Open

    Z.ai · Max effort

    55.8%
  10. 10
    Hy4 previewOpen

    Tencent

    55.1%
  11. 11
    Mistral Large 4

    Mistral AI · High effort

    54.7%
  12. 12
    GPT-5.6 Terra

    OpenAI · Max effort

    54.4%
  13. 13
    Claude Haiku 5.5

    Anthropic · Max effort

    54.1%
  14. 14
    GPT-6 Astra

    OpenAI · Max effort

    53.5%
  15. 15
    DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpen

    DeepSeek · High effort

    53.5%
  16. 16
    Kimi K3Open

    Moonshot AI · Max effort

    53.1%
  17. 17
    Grok 4.7

    SpaceXAI · xHigh effort

    52.3%
  18. 18
    GPT-6.1 Sol

    OpenAI · Max effort

    52.0%
  19. 19
    Step 5 Preview

    StepFun

    50.7%
  20. 20
    Qwen3.8-Max

    Alibaba

    50.6%
  21. 21
    DeepSeek V4 ProOpen

    DeepSeek · Max effort

    50.4%
  22. 22
    GPT-6 Luna

    OpenAI · Max effort

    49.9%
  23. 23
    MiniMax-M3Open

    MiniMax

    48.3%
  24. 24
    TM
    InklingOpen

    Thinking Machines Lab

    46.6%
  25. 25
    Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Google DeepMind · High effort

    43.0%
  26. 26
    TM
    Inkling-SmallOpen

    Thinking Machines Lab

    41.3%
15 tracked models without a result

Command A+, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Gemma 4 31B, GLM-5.3-Flash, gpt-oss-120b, Hy3, Kimi K2.7 Code, MAI-Thinking-1, Mistral Medium 3.5, Mistral Small 4, Muse Glimmer 30B, Nemotron 3 Ultra, Nova 2 Lite, Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen3.8-Flash.

Missing means the evaluator has not published a run, not that the model would score poorly.

Model Index

An independent snapshot of frontier SI models and how they perform on third-party benchmarks.

Data as of Oct 8, 2026

Explore

  • All models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Model finder
  • Labs
  • Methodology & sources

Sources

Benchmark results come from Artificial Analysis, Arena, Vals AI and ARC Prize. Specifications and prices come from each lab's own documentation.

Not affiliated with any lab or evaluator. Names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to identify them. Scores change often — check the linked source before making a decision that depends on one.

  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder
  • Overview
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Benchmarks
  • Finder