Ordinal

Which model is worth using

1 Oct 2026

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

The fast Claude. Two points behind Opus at max effort on the index, and more expensive per measured task because it spends more output tokens.

47Index · High
$1.08Per measured task
43.5 pts/$Points / $
94Tokens / sec

Every published effort

SettingIndexPer taskTokens / sec
Max56$7.62139
Extra high52$2.74103
High47$1.0894
Medium41$0.5992

What this workload costs

List price for one call. Reasoning tokens count as output. A cache hit uses the lab’s cache rate when one is published.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Cache applied
$0.0622

Specs

API id
claude-sonnet-5-5
Released
28 Sep 2026
Context
1M
Max output
128k
Input / 1M
$2.00
Output / 1M
$10.00
Cache read / 1M
$0.20
Knowledge
—
Inputs
Text, Image
Weights
Closed

Same sticker as Sonnet 5. Cache reads stay at $0.20. Max effort is expensive per task because the model writes a lot of tokens, not because the token price changed.

Use it when

Everyday Claude work, edits, and terminal tasks. Extra-high is the compromise. Max effort is a frontier coding setting, and it was one of the most expensive measured tasks in this snapshot.

Leave it when

Leaving max effort on for routine traffic. The token price looks like Sol. The task cost does not.

Other independent scores

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0: 64%. Max effort. Ahead of Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra in that write-up. Artificial Analysis, Sonnet 5.5 article, 28 Sep 2026.
  • AutomationBench-AA: 71%. Max effort. Artificial Analysis, 30 Sep 2026.

Sources